NEURALINK: A challenge for neuro-rights in the age of brain connectivity.

NEURALINK: A challenge for neuro-rights in the age of brain connectivity.

Since Elon Musk announced Neuralinkhas generated a great deal of interest and debate about its implications, particularly with regard to the neural data privacy. Undoubtedly, this technological innovation that directly connects our brains to computers opens up a world of exciting opportunities. However, it also raises questions about individual autonomy and information security.

NEURALINK: A challenge for neuro-rights in the age of brain connectivity.

How is the privacy and integrity of our thoughts preserved in this new paradigm of brain wiring?

What is Neuralink?

Neuralink is a neurotechnology company founded by Elon Musk in 2017 that aims to revolutionise the way we interact with technology.

Its vision is creating brain-technology interconnections through implantable chips in the head that allow for an integration between the human mind and the artificial intelligence. In this way we would be able to communicate directly with the cloud, access instant information and possibly improve the quality of life of individuals with neurological disorders.

With regard to the latter, Neuralink focuses its innovation mainly on the benefits for health and improved quality of lifeThe aim is to give people with quadriplegia or paraplegia the ability to control electronic devices with your mindThis would give them greater autonomy and freedom.

But in the long term, this technology could also have the potential to enhance cognitive abilities, which could transform the lives of people suffering from conditions such as hearing loss and/or the inability to speak.

But all that glitters is not all that glitters...

Ethics and development of Neuralink

This innovation has generated controversy over its ethics and animal testing. Despite gaining approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for human testing, the company has been criticised for its ethical handling of animal testing, highlighting a conflict between speed of development and adherence to ethical standards.

The company conducted tests with a dozen monkeys, which were implanted with devices and despite the problems reported in some of the monkeys, such as infections, paralysis or brain inflammation among others, the company continued looking for human volunteers. In fact, through a statement on his X account, Elon Musk reported that they had implanted one of their devices in a human being.but offered no further details, except to confirm that the person had survived.

NEURALINK: A challenge for neuro-rights in the age of brain connectivity.

There is no doubt that the coming advances in neural technology could mark a change in our society. Using this kind of technology, our perception of what it means to be human would change and this would make us reconsider how we differentiate between the natural and the man-made.

Meanwhile, companies like Facebook, which already have access to a wealth of information about us, are investing in this technology.

However, what if these companies misuse the data they hold on their users?

Neural data privacy

The neuro-rights are fundamental rights that protect people's privacy and cognitive autonomy in relation to their brain activity. They seek to secure control over one's own mind and prevent manipulation or exploitation of neural data without consent. These rights are essential to preserve human dignity and ensure that technological progress respects the ethical and moral values of society.

With the development of Neuralink technology, the protection of brain data has become an issue of particular relevance as access to brain data raises the question of how to protect the brain. mental privacy concerns and the ability to find or manipulate people's thoughts and emotions.

The main issue is how these devices are to be regulated.

In the event that this new technology is used as a consumer good, the negative impact it can have on society can be reflected in both mental health and creating technology dependency and reducing critical thinking in addition to the manipulation by third parties for commercial or political purposes.

Special attention should be paid to young people as they are the most vulnerable and most likely to use new technological methods. Mar España, director of the Data Protection AgencyThe new law, he assures us that when this happens, work will be done on a bill to protect minors on the internet.

Therefore, in order to have it more controlled and to make its use really relevant, it is suggested that brain devices be regulated as medical devices and its use is restricted in contexts where privacy and security risks may arise.

For an ethical and secure future

The protection of neuro-rights becomes a key issue as we move forward with the development of technologies such as Neuralink. Authorities need to take proactive measures to ensure that these innovations do not compromise the mental integrity and autonomy of individuals.

There is a need for a open and transparent debate on the ethical and societal implications of these technologies, with the active participation of society in making decisions about its use and regulation. While we cannot stop technological progress, we can influence how it is used.

What is really important is not whether we will merge with the machines, but under what conditions we will do so.

It is therefore essential to establishing a sound ethical and legal framework to ensure that the brain connectivity is beneficial and safe for all in the future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

en_GBEnglish (UK)
Immediate online

And choose which negative content you want to remove

Open chat
Need help?
Hello 👋
How can we help you?