The Vito Quiles Case: Miscarriages of Justice and the Right to Rectification

The Vito Quiles Case: Miscarriages of Justice and the Right to Rectification

The right of rectification is an essential component of the right to information, the protection of honour and the reputation of individuals. This right allows any individual to correcting inaccurate or damaging information published against them and is regulated in Organic Law 2/1984 of 26 March 1984.

A recent case that exemplifies the application and importance of this right is the case of Vito Quilesjournalist linked to Alvise Perezknown for his activism and leadership in the group "Se acabó la fiesta".

In this blog we explain the development and resolution of this case, highlighting the importance of the right of rectification in the judicial and media context.

The case of Vito Quiles

In May 2024, the magistrate María José Moreno Díaz, of the Juzgado de Instrucción 18 of Seville, issued an order adopting a warrant of arrest against Vito Quiles. This precautionary measure was adopted in the framework of an investigation into the complaint filed by Rubén SánchezFacua, a spokesperson for the consumer organisation Facua, against Quiles.

According to the complaint, Quiles had made comments on social networks accusing Sanchez of "extortion and scams". and suggesting the existence of links between Facua and child abuse schemes in the Valencian Community and the Balearic Islands.

The Vito Quiles Case: Miscarriages of Justice and the Right to Rectification

Judicial rectification

The issuance of the arrest warrant generated a considerable media controversy. However, it quickly became clear that there had been an error in the judicial decision. Judge Moreno Díaz acknowledged that the inclusion of the arrest warrant in the warrant was a mistake.

According to the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Andalucía (TSJA), the rectification was swift, and the judge sent a correction in which she pointed out that the correct precautionary measure was the "whereabouts enquiry of Quiles, not his detention. The Communication Office of the TSJA clarified that the error occurred in the legal reasoning of the order issued on 27 May.

Despite the reference to an arrest warrant, the measure taken by the court was simply to locate Quiles, who could not be summoned to his home or contacted by telephone. This rectification underlines the importance of the right of rectification not only in the media, but also in the judicial process.

Importance of the Right of Rectification

The right of rectification is fundamental to to protect the reputation and honour of individuals against erroneous or harmful information. This right is especially relevant in the digital age, where news and commentary can spread quickly and widely.

In the case of Vito Quiles, the swift rectification by the judge prevented an incorrect judicial measure from having serious consequences for him, demonstrating how this right can right wrongs and safeguard individual rights.

In addition, this case highlights the responsibility of the media and judicial institutions for ensuring the accuracy of published information. Errors, even unintentional ones, can have an impact on the significant impact in people's lives, and it is crucial that mechanisms are in place to correct them in a timely and effective manner.

The Vito Quiles Case: Miscarriages of Justice and the Right to Rectification

Reflections on the case

The case of Vito Quiles also raises questions about the relationship between the freedom of expression and the protection of reputation. While freedom of expression is a fundamental right, it is a fundamental right, this should not be used to spread unfounded accusations. that may damage the reputation of others. The social mediaIn particular, the speed and scope of information dissemination have increased, making the balance between these rights even more crucial.

In the case of Quiles, the accusations made on social networks and in the media, led to a lawsuit that culminated in a improper legal action. The swift rectification by the magistrate was an appropriate measure to correct the error and avoid further damage.

This incident highlights the need for a utmost diligence both in the issuance of judicial measures as in the publication of information in the media and social networks.

As information continues to be a vital resource in society, it is vital that there are effective mechanisms to correct errors and protect people's rights. The swift and proper rectification in the Quiles case is a positive example of how the judicial system and the media must act to ensure justice and truthfulness.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

en_GBEnglish (UK)
Immediate online

And choose which negative content you want to remove

Open chat
Need help?
Hello 👋
How can we help you?